INVENTARISASI DAN KAJIAN OBJEK PEMAJUAN KEBUDAYAAN DAN CAGAR BUDAYA DI KABUPATEN PACITAN (DANA INDONESIANA 2025)

INVENTARISASI DAN   KAJIAN   OBJEK   PEMAJUAN   KEBUDAYAAN DAN CAGAR BUDAYA DI KABUPATEN PACITAN (DANA INDONESIANA 2025)
SHARE

INVENTARISASI DAN KAJIAN OBJEK PEMAJUAN KEBUDAYAAN DAN CAGAR BUDAYA DI KABUPATEN PACITAN

Agoes Hendriyanto 1*, Bakti Sutopo 2, Sri Iriyanti 3,  Muhamad Rafid Musyaffa 4

1*, 2Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia STKIP PGRI Pacitan, Indonesia

3 Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah STKIP PGRI Pacitan, Indonesia

4 Socio Cultura Indonesia

ABSTRAK

This study aims to inventory and assess Cultural Advancement Objects (Objek Pemajuan Kebudayaan/OPK) and cultural heritage in Pacitan Regency within the framework of the Indonesiana 2025 Program. This research employed a descriptive qualitative approach conducted across 12 sub-districts in Pacitan Regency, East Java Province. Data were collected through field observations, in-depth interviews with cultural practitioners, community leaders, traditional custodians, and local historians, documentation, and historical studies. The collected data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, including data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that Pacitan Regency possesses abundant cultural resources, encompassing prehistoric archaeological sites, early socio-political systems, ritual traditions, performing arts, oral traditions, traditional knowledge, and colonial heritage that continue to exist today. These findings demonstrate the continuity of civilization and cultural acculturation that shape the cultural identity of the Pacitan community. This study provides a comprehensive scientific inventory that can serve as a reference for cultural preservation policies and supports sustainable cultural advancement in accordance with Law Number 5 of 2017 concerning Cultural Advancement.

Keyword: Cultural Advancement Objects, Cultural Heritage, Inventory, Pacitan Regency, Indonesiana

Hendriyanto, A., Sutopo, B., Iriyanti, S., & Musyaffa, M. R. (2026). Inventarisasi dan Kajian Objek Pemajuan Kebudayaan dan Cagar Budaya Di Kabupaten Pacitan. NUSRA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan7(3), 1749–1765. https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v7i3.6377. https://ejournal.nusantaraglobal.ac.id/index.php/nusra/article/view/6377/4886

Baca Juga  Pendaftaran Mahasiswa Baru STKIP PGRI Pacitan Tahun Akademik 2023/2024

References

Burton G., dan D. R. (1995). Between Ourselves. Edward Arnold.

Farida, I., Lestari, R. Y., & Raharja, R. M. (2026). Implementasi Budaya Sekolah Dalam Menanamkan Karakter Peserta Didik SMP Negeri 1 Kota Serang. NUSRA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v7i1.4031

Hartanto T., Hendriyanto A., & R. M. M. (2025). Duplikasi Wayang Beber Tawangalun Pacitan. Sabbhata Yatra : Jurnal Pariwisata Dan Budaya, 6(2), 432–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53565/sabbhatayatra.v6i2.1858

Hendriyanto,A., Sutopo B., dan M. A. (2019). The Preservation Strategy of Kethek Ogleng Pacitan in Millennial Era. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 8(5C). https://www.ijeat.org/portfolio-item/E10780585C19/

Hendriyanto A., Perwiranto J, dan Taufan A. (2024). Situs Watupatok, Sejarah Pacitan yang Terlupakan. Nata Karya.

Baca Juga  Mercy Bagong, Raja Jalanan Kelas Truk Medium Era 70-90 an

Hendriyanto A., dan S. B. (2021). Upacara Adat tetaken Desa Mantren Kecamatan Kebonagung, Pacitan, Jawa Timur, Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 11(2), 1615–1621.

KITLV 167772. (1941). Prehistorisch gebruiksvoorwerp van steen uit Taboehan bij Patjitan.

KITLV 167793. (1941). Opgraving te Baksoka bij Patjitan.

Koentjaraningrat. (1990). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Rineka Cipta.

Koentjaraningrat. (1994). Kebudayaan Mentalis dan Pembangunan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

L.J Moleong. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Rake Sarasin (Issue Maret). Pustaka Setia.

Miles Mattew, B. & Huberman, A. (2007). Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohisi. Universitas Indonesia.

Peursen, C. A. Van. (1976). Strategi Kebudayaan (terj. Dick Hartoko). Gunung. Mulia.

Puja Pangestu A, A. H. Y. (2020). Kajian Budaya Dan Potensi Kearifan Lokal Di Gunung Limo Sebagai Ikon Wisata Budaya Pacitan. Jurnal Pemerinthan Dan Politik, 5(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v5i3.1130

Baca Juga  Bupati Indartato Sambangi Warga Serahkan Bantuan dan Upayakan Perbaikan Rumah

Purwasito, A. (2015). Komunikasi Multikultural. Pustaka Pelajar.

Stebbing B. (1999). Learning through Play: A Manual for ECEC Teachers. UNICEEF Printers.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R &. Alfabeta.

Suprapto B. (2018). Pemanfaatan Cagar Budaya di Kabupaten Pacitan sebagai Media Penunjang Pendidikan Sejarah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Indonesia, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um033v1i12018085

Sutopo B, Hendriyanto A, K. H. (2019). The Local Wisdom Found in Mantra and Dramatic Elements of The badut Sinampurna: A Traditional Ceremony From Ploso, Pacitan Regency, East java Provinsi. The 4Th International Comperences on Literature 1 (Literature and Society 5 …, 69–79.

Sutopo B., dan H. A. (2019). NilaiLuhur dalam Olahraga Tradisional Brojogeni Pondok Pesantren, Tremas, Kecamatan Arjosari, Kab.Pacitan, Provinsi Jatim. Webinar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Dan Abdimas 2019, 102–110.

Tylor, E. B. (1871a). Primitive Culture.

Tylor, E. B. (1871b). Primitive Culture. 1(2)

UU No 5 Pemajuan Kebudayaan (2017).

Warren MD. (1996). Indigenous Knowledge in Education Proceedings. University of Ibadan Press.